Mobile learning is often defined in terms of the
technology that mediates the learning: learning with mobile technology is
mobile learning. Mobility, however, is not an exclusive property of the
technology, it also resides in the lifestyle of the learner, who in the
course of everyday life moves from one context to another, switching
locations, social groups, technologies and topics; and learning often
takes place inconspicuously or is crammed in the short gaps between these
transitions. Although this view of learning is inclusive of formal
education contexts, it is particularly pertinent to informal learning
outside educational institutions. Moreover, this view exposes the
complexities of mobile learning and the related difficulties of mobile
learning research.
Studies of mobile and informal learning are often based
on the learners' own accounts and metacognitive analyses of their
learning, by means of semi-structured interviews, surveys, and diary
studies. Such retrospective accounts of learning come with limitations, in
terms of accuracy of recall and of the rationalisation or 'tidying up'
that retrospective accounts may undergo. Moreover, younger learners may
not possess the metacognitive skills necessary for producing adequate
reflective accounts of their experiences.
Furthermore, mobile and informal learning research
methods need to allow us to study not only the learning that occurs during
the learning experience, but also how it develops afterwards. Learning
does not result from single, individual experiences, but rather it is
cumulative, "emerging over time through myriad human experiences,
including but not limited to experiences in museums and schools; while
watching television, reading newspapers and books, conversing with friends
and family; and increasingly frequently, through interactions with the
Internet. The experiences children and adults have in these various
situations, dynamically interact to influence the ways individuals
construct scientific knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, and understanding"
(Dierking et al. 2003: 109). The cumulative nature of learning makes it
difficult to isolate a distinct learning event for inspection. The
inherent inconsistency of the learning practice in mobile contexts in
terms of activity structure and learning outcomes (Taylor 2006) makes such
inspections even more complex.
This workshop will focus on mobile and informal
learning research methods in order to address:
- Whether existing methods are adequate in providing us with the data
we need: what is missing and how can we access it;
- What are the methodological, practical and ethical concerns with
existing methods;
- How existing methods compare: in what ways are the data they yield
comparable and / or complementary.
Through presentations and group discussions, we hope to
arrive at a set of requirements for mobile and informal learning research
methods to inform future work in this area.